Self-ID and Driving Licences

I’ve frequently read on Twitter of claims that the proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act will merely be an extension of the self-identification processes we already have for passports and driving licences.

This was news to me. It was a long time ago admittedly, but I seem to recall needing my birth certificate when I first applied for a driving licence. So I thought I’d investigate a bit further.

Google took me to the Just Be Yourself website which explained the peculiarities of how a person’s sex is shown on their driving licence – section 5 shows your driving number: the seventh character of which is either 0 or 1 for male, or 5 or 6 for female. Checked my licence: yip, a five for me.

Following their link to gov.uk it seems I need to complete form D1 and enclose any supporting documents for a name or gender change.

The leaflet that comes with the form explains further:

If your name and/or gender is different from that shown on your current driving licence you must provide proof of this change.

Photocard licence holders – you must provide identity document(s) showing a clear link between your current name and the name on your licence.

Well, I don’t intend changing my name at all, so have no need to send in any documents. On with the form, which is pretty straightforward, except for not having an option anywhere for changing gender! Undeterred I crossed out ‘name’ and replaced it with ‘gender’ in the options list, and in the blank box wrote the explanation “I self-identify as male. Please change the gender identity marker on my driving licence.”

This was really important. I had no wish to lie on an official form. I was not changing my sex, I was self-identifying a gender identity. I really felt affinity with masculine stereotypes when I signed the form.

So, for the price of a second class stamp I waited to see what DVLA would do…

Roll forward three weeks and my new driving licence arrived! Really…no…they wouldn’t…surely not? Check the seventh character, and it’s zero! I’m officially male – with the same feminine first name, and the title Ms.

I’m still a little shocked at how easy it was. DVLA could have rejected my application on several points by saying it was a sex or even a legal gender category, but they didn’t. No questions asked, no querying of my female title, no paperwork required, no proof of transition, no doctor’s letter. Nothing.

It’s official, the male/female category on your driving licence does not reflect your biological sex, but your gender identity. I hope you have one.

But why is this important? Arguably, the DVLA has no need to know a person’s sex and, as insurance companies no longer price differentiate between males and females, maybe sex should be removed from driving licences altogether?

However, I can think of four good reasons for knowing a driver’s sex:

  1. A photo driving licence is a primary form of personal identification used for a wide range of purposes, from applications to work with vulnerable people, accessing state benefits, right the way down to simply buying a bottle of wine. Such official documentation should be credible and accurate, and yes, the majority of people can still determine biological sex despite any outward changes to appearance or attire.
  2. It forms part of the data managed by DVLA and is often passed to police and local authorities and used to identify people for various crimes and penalties. It would be very confusing if the police knocked on my door looking to arrest a man for a (hypothetical) hit-and-run accident in which a witness described me as a woman.
  3. Organ donation is encoded on a driving licence. For any medical procedure it is vital that sex is accurate.
  4. Collection and analysis of statistical information. For example, more men than women pass the practical driving test on their first attempt (it’s the other way round for the theory driving test). This is important information to have if addressing any sex discrimination concerns. Similarly, if the police wish to reduce road rage incidents it would be helpful to target campaigns effectively, for example towards males in a certain age range. Leaving aside arguments of nature v nurture these are still biological differences, and sex rather than gender identity is the information required.

If these issues are important to us, and I believe they are, then the information shown on licences should be meaningful, reflective of reality, and accurate.

It’s worth noting that this little known about procedure for changing sex/gender identity on licences is in place before any changes are made to self-id legislation; when and who decided this I don’t know. What happens if the Scottish and UK Governments announce a law whereby anyone can officially ‘choose’ their sex? What will be the impact on crime statistics, safe driving campaigns, credibility of photo ID? Has any research been conducted on the likely uptake?

I wonder what the cost was to the DVLA of my little experiment – processing, printing new photocard licence, postage costs? I could do this every three weeks. So could a lot of people. #ManFriday

PS. I’m also rather peeved at losing my Scottish identity from my licence.

This entry was posted in Activism, No to Self-ID. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Self-ID and Driving Licences

  1. Anne Lacey says:

    Does that mean you could have two licenses – one specially to use on manfriday?

  2. Ren Clithero says:

    Fraud implications are HUGE. Sex is primary factor in identity verification. Literally the first thing you look at is age and sex when matching a person to their ID photo, what is the point in having any details on this government document if they can all be faked. Pretending sex isn’t immutable or observable, in person, is ridiculous, Orwellian bullshit.

  3. Rudolph Green says:

    I hope you’ve updated your insurance too. The two need to match.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *